This is from the Grauniad. Makes you wonder what English Judges are like, then I remember.
By the way, I forgot to wish you a happy birthday Andrew. Sorry, having brain meltdowns.
"Dan Tench is a lawyer who writes on media issues for the Guardian.
Here he describes how he became the first person to crack the secret
message hidden within Mr Justice Peter Smith's judgment on the Da Vinci
Code case, which pitted author Dan Brown against two writers who failed
in their claim that he breached their copyright to create his
bestselling novel.
Three weeks ago, while reading the judgment, I
noticed something odd. Throughout the text, the occasional letter has
been italicised. There was an "m" in the word claimant in the second
paragraph, and an "i" and a "t" italicised in the next. I supposed it
was simply a word processing fault.
The case centred on two books - one non-fiction, The Holy Blood and the
Holy Grail, and one fiction, The Da Vinci Code - both dedicated to the
subject of encryption and hidden messages, but I did not seriously
consider that the judge could have implanted a hidden message in the
judgment. High court judges simply do not do such things.
But it did seem ironic that a judgment in such a case should appear to have such an eccentricity running though it.
Then
I received an email from Mr Justice Peter Smith. He told me to
scrutinise paragraph one of the judgment more closely. This revealed
that there was an italicised "s" and, reading carefully, the first 10
italicised letters spelled out "SMITHYCODE". Clearly there was a
message here. The judge was laying a trail, denoting the code with his
own name, in a style after The Da Vinci Code.
Reading further,
the italicisation of random letters continued. This spelled a jumble:
"JAEIEXTOST" and so on. We tried simply moving the letters ยทforward
and back a little in the alphabet, but this revealed no sensible
phrase. Then the judge let on that the key to the code was based on the
Fibonnaci sequence - the mathematical progression which is based on
adding the two preceding numbers in the series: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13
and so on. The Fibonnaci sequence was an essential part of the plot of
The Da Vinci Code.
After much trial and error, we found a formula
which fitted. This revealed (disregarding a few slips by the judge) the
slightly perplexing script "JACKIEFISHERWHOAREYOUDREADNOUGHT", which is
presumably to be rendered: "Jackie Fisher, who are you? Dreadnought".
This must be taken as a doubtless riposte by the judge, who lists the
study of the early 20th century admiral, Jackie Fisher, as a main
interest. When asked who was Jackie Fisher, how many times must he have
answered that Admiral Fisher conceived of the great battleship HMS
Dreadnought?
Yesterday the judge sent a message: "Brilliant. You
got it all ... You can rightly claim that you started it and got there
first. I thought it had been missed until you found it."."